This is a news story, published by MSN, that relates primarily to Josh Hawley news.
For more Josh Hawley news, you can click here:
more Josh Hawley newsFor more labor activism news, you can click here:
more labor activism newsFor more news from MSN, you can click here:
more news from MSNOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about labor activism, you might also like this article about
removal protections Congress. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Supreme Court confrontation news, federal employees news, news about labor activism, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
post Trump firingsRoll Call
•US Politics
US Politics
77% Informative
The White House has fired more than a dozen inspectors general and independent agency board members in the last week .
Experts say the firings appear to be “deliberately violating the law to provide a test case” to see if the Supreme Court will side with the president’s efforts to control the executive branch.
Under existing law, Trump has the authority to remove members for cause at agencies across the federal government.
Sen. Josh Hawley , R-Mo., defended Trump ’s firing of a member of the National Labor Relations Board without stating the reasons for the firing.
“Almost every president thinks they ought to have more control over the administrative state, and most of the time, Congress thinks they should have less,” Hawley said.
Cato Institute has unsuccessfully asked the Supreme Court to take up the issue.
VR Score
81
Informative language
79
Neutral language
72
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
59
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
4
Source diversity
1
Affiliate links
no affiliate links
