This is a news story, published by MSN, that relates primarily to Donald Trump news.
For more Donald Trump news, you can click here:
more Donald Trump newsFor more Us political corruption news, you can click here:
more Us political corruption newsFor more news from MSN, you can click here:
more news from MSNOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us political corruption, you might also like this article about
presidential Cabinet nominees. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest previous FBI director news, other Trump nominee news, news about Us political corruption, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
lawful ordersWashington Post
•US Politics
US Politics
72% Informative
President Donald Trump 's nominees have for some reason punted on this question.
They’ve done so even as it’s become a pretty standard question in these confirmation hearings.
Some have at least signaled they would be bound by the law, even if they didn’t directly answer the question.
But at least one other nominee has been willing to go there.
The question has been of keen interest even to Republican senators.
So why are Trump ’s nominees suddenly avoiding the kinds of direct answers their predecessors were happy to give? The obvious answer is that they don’t want to play into the premise that Trump would actually do these things.
Or perhaps they’re signaling that they plan to give Trump the benefit of any doubt.
VR Score
75
Informative language
70
Neutral language
57
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
48
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
10
Source diversity
2
Affiliate links
no affiliate links
