Mounties Breached Drug Dealer's Rights

This is a news story, published by vancouversun, that relates primarily to Abdelkad news.

Abdelkad news

For more Abdelkad news, you can click here:

more Abdelkad news

News about civil rights activism

For more civil rights activism news, you can click here:

more civil rights activism news

vancouversun news

For more news from vancouversun, you can click here:

more news from vancouversun

About the Otherweb

Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about civil rights activism, you might also like this article about

Vernon RCMP drug investigators

. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Vernon RCMP news, Vernon parking lot news, news about civil rights activism, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!

Vernon RCMP officer

vancouversun

•

US Politics

B.C. judge tosses drug evidence for 'flagrant’ rights violations by RCMP

Summary

Nutrition label

69% Informative

B.C. Supreme Court issues separate rulings on evidence collected against Nabil Abdelkader in 2020 .

Ruling: Mounties used hit-and-run investigation as a ruse to ensnare him for drug trafficking.

Court found police colluded with civil forfeiture authorities to bypass due process obligations to avoid giving back the Jeep .

Judge found police actions “intrusive,” and ruled hidden compartment was Abdelkad ’s “private space”.

Abdelkader's lawyer Tony Paisana said the court’s findings in the case are “significant and unusual,” and his client is trying to put the years -long legal ordeal behind him.

The federal Public Prosecution Service of Canada said it is “reviewing the decision and has 30 days to consider whether an appeal is in the public interest”.

VR Score

Informative language

Neutral language

Article tone

semi-formal

Language

English

Language complexity

Offensive language

possibly offensive

Hate speech

not hateful