Data on Car Crash Deaths Missing
This is a US news story, published by Ars Technica, that relates primarily to Trump news.
US news
For more US news, you can click here:
more US newsTrump news
For more Trump news, you can click here:
more Trump newsNews about Us federal policies
For more Us federal policies news, you can click here:
more Us federal policies newsArs Technica news
For more news from Ars Technica, you can click here:
more news from Ars TechnicaAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us federal policies, you might also like this article about
dataset tracking car crash deaths. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest car crash fatalities news, NHTSA news, news about Us federal policies, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
car crash deathsArs Technica
•US Politics
US Politics
Queer-friendly data on car crash deaths removed from NHTSA website

78% Informative
A dataset tracking car crash deaths in the US went missing from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's website in early February .
The odd removal sparked concerns that the Trump administration may be changing or possibly ending the Fatality Analysis Reporting System .
NHTSA told Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety that the data was taken down for "minor corrections".
VR Score
81
Informative language
84
Neutral language
1
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
68
Offensive language
likely offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
4
Source diversity
4
Affiliate links
no affiliate links