Toronto Police Chats Fired Whistleblower
This is a news story, published by CityNews, that relates primarily to Firouzeh Zarabi-Majd news.
Firouzeh Zarabi-Majd news
For more Firouzeh Zarabi-Majd news, you can click here:
more Firouzeh Zarabi-Majd newsNews about Us police misconduct
For more Us police misconduct news, you can click here:
more Us police misconduct newsCityNews news
For more news from CityNews, you can click here:
more news from CityNewsAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us police misconduct, you might also like this article about
Toronto police chats. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Toronto Police Association news, Toronto Police Service news, news about Us police misconduct, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Former Toronto Police Service officer Firouzeh ZarabiCityNews
•US Politics
US Politics
Toronto police chats undermined testimony. But it was a whistleblower who got fired

74% Informative
Firouzeh Zarabi-Majd said she found out about the unofficial 51 Division group chat “accidentally” after being told about it by a colleague.
She would go on to be fired for insubordination after posting the material on social media along with profanity-laced criticisms of the force.
Fellow officers involved in the conversations have not been publicly disciplined, even after two of them had their remarks dissected to undermine courtroom testimony in unrelated cases.
VR Score
74
Informative language
71
Neutral language
77
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
51
Offensive language
likely offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
1
Source diversity
1
Affiliate links
no affiliate links