This is a news story, published by BBC, that relates primarily to Dan news.
For more Dan news, you can click here:
more Dan newsFor more Ai research news, you can click here:
more Ai research newsFor more news from BBC, you can click here:
more news from BBCOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best tech news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Ai research, you might also like this article about
viral AI history videos. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Historian news, Historians news, news about Ai research, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
historical contentBBC
•Technology
Technology
76% Informative
AI-generated videos showing the points of view of people waking up in different historical time periods have gone viral on TikTok .
Historians have shared concerns about the accuracy of the content and whether AI can truly resurrect the past.
Dan and Hogne are the creators behind two of the accounts - POV Lab and Time Traveller POV.
Dan says his videos are not meant to be taken as pure historical fact and encourage viewers to research history.
Prof Frood has concerns that the videos haven't been created accurately or reliably.
She thinks the viral nature of these videos is less about their historical content and more about the public's fascination with AI itself.
She says a concerning inaccuracy in the video is that the retractor is based on images from after the disaster rather than before.
VR Score
72
Informative language
65
Neutral language
77
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
50
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
medium-lived
External references
6
Source diversity
2
Affiliate links
no affiliate links
