Summary

Article Metadata

Senate Republicans Criticize Research

This is a news story, published by Ars Technica, that relates primarily to Senate news.

News about Us federal policies

For more Us federal policies news, you can click here:

more Us federal policies news

Ars Technica news

For more news from Ars Technica, you can click here:

more news from Ars Technica

About the Otherweb

Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us federal policies, you might also like this article about

National Science Foundation grants

. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Cruz news, federal funding news, news about Us federal policies, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!

powerful Senate Committee

Ars Technica

Ars Technica

•

US Politics

US Politics

In war against DEI in science, researchers see collateral damage

Ars Technica

Summary

Nutrition label

72% Informative

Nearly 3,500 National Science Foundation grants were recently described by Senate Republicans as ideological and of questionable scientific value.

The list was compiled by a group of Senate Republicans last fall and released to the public earlier this month .

The NSF accounts for around one-quarter of federal funding for science and engineering research at American colleges and universities.

VR Score

74

Informative language

73

Neutral language

5

Article tone

formal

Language

English

Language complexity

58

Offensive language

possibly offensive

Hate speech

not hateful

Attention-grabbing headline

not detected

Known propaganda techniques

detected

Time-value

short-lived

External references

15

https://www.usaspending.gov/award/ASST_NON_2308517_4900 https://ies.ed.gov/science-technology-engineering-mathematics https://x.com/darren_lipomi/status/1890179491554816498 https://bsky.app/profile/dlipomi.bsky.social/post/3li3thme3qc22 https://www.notus.org/margaret-manto https://www.commerce.senate.gov/2025/2/cruz-led-investigation-uncovers-2-billion-in-woke-dei-grants-at-nsf-releases-full-database https://undark.org/2025/02/21/anti-dei-unsettles-scientists/https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/ending-radical-and-wasteful-government-dei-programs-and-preferencing/https://www.nsf.gov/funding/learn/broader-impacts https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=2320345&HistoricalAwards=false https://www.linkedin.com/posts/darren-lipomi-5926187_cruz-led-investigation-uncovers-2-billion-activity-7295812417756835840-HLDF?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAAAJYWNkBP6AxLEpYMfMrbJfVwtOdENA1LE8 https://undark.org https://www.notus.org/https://www.commerce.senate.gov/services/files/4BD2D522-2092-4246-91A5-58EEF99750BC https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/ted-cruz.jpg

Source diversity

11

www.usaspending.gov ies.ed.gov x.com bsky.app www.notus.org www.commerce.senate.gov undark.org www.whitehouse.gov www.nsf.gov www.linkedin.com cdn.arstechnica.net

Affiliate links

no affiliate links

Read full article