Supreme Court Rejects Voting Bill
This is a Arizona news story, published by MSN, that relates primarily to the Supreme Court's news.
Arizona news
For more Arizona news, you can click here:
more Arizona newsNews about SCOTUS
For more SCOTUS news, you can click here:
more SCOTUS newsMSN news
For more news from MSN, you can click here:
more news from MSNAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about SCOTUS, you might also like this article about
discriminatory intent. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest discriminatory attempt news, appeal news, news about SCOTUS, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Supreme CourtFoxnews
•US Politics
US Politics
Arizona Senate leader hopes for Trump DOJ aid in proof of citizenship voting fight
58% Informative
The Arizona Republican says he was surprised by the Supreme Court's decision to deny citizens the right to vote in the state's elections.
He says the ruling was unprecedented even for the liberal and mostly overturned court in the nation.
The bill says only citizens should be able to vote and that only citizens can vote in their elections.
VR Score
63
Informative language
61
Neutral language
51
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
33
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links