This is a news story, published by Telegraph, that relates primarily to Armed Forces news.
For more United kingdom politics news, you can click here:
more United kingdom politics newsFor more news from Telegraph, you can click here:
more news from TelegraphOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best world news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about United kingdom politics, you might also like this article about
British foreign policy. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest national security strategy news, coherent national security strategy news, news about United kingdom politics, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
British Armed ForcesTelegraph
•World
World
61% Informative
Defence and aid are not competing priorities they are complementary pillars of a coherent security strategy.
The notion that we must weaken one to strengthen the other is not just misleading but dangerous.
A lack of investment in aid and development will only fuel greater instability, increase security threats, and place a heavier burden on our Armed Forces .
The decision to cut aid is a decision to accept greater global instability, weakened British influence, and an increased risk of conflict.
It is time for a rethink before we find ourselves paying a far higher price in the years to come.
Parliament must not let this moment pass without challenge.
VR Score
70
Informative language
72
Neutral language
17
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
56
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
medium-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links
