This is a Whitehall news story, published by The Times & The Sunday Times, that relates primarily to Keir Starmer news.
For more Whitehall news, you can click here:
more Whitehall newsFor more Keir Starmer news, you can click here:
more Keir Starmer newsFor more United kingdom politics news, you can click here:
more United kingdom politics newsFor more news from The Times & The Sunday Times, you can click here:
more news from The Times & The Sunday TimesOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best world news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about United kingdom politics, you might also like this article about
defence spending. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest British armed forces news, armoured vehicles news, news about United kingdom politics, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
strategic defence reviewThe Times & The Sunday Times
•World
World
68% Informative
Sir Keir Starmer ’s strategic defence review will set out plans to modernise the army, navy and RAF over the next decade .
Prime minister has promised to increase defence spending to 2.5 per cent of GDP by 2027 .
But President Trumps ambivalent remarks about Nato ’s Article 5 have raised concerns in Whitehall .
Shadow armed forces minister said the review needed to prioritise off-the-shelf procurement’.
VR Score
75
Informative language
77
Neutral language
45
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
59
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links