Pandemic control preferences clash
This is a news story, published by Guardian, that relates primarily to Laura Spinney news.
Laura Spinney news
For more Laura Spinney news, you can click here:
more Laura Spinney newsNews about epidemics & outbreaks
For more epidemics & outbreaks news, you can click here:
more epidemics & outbreaks newsGuardian news
For more news from Guardian, you can click here:
more news from GuardianAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best health news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about epidemics & outbreaks, you might also like this article about
Covid control measures. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest pandemic news, fake Covid narrative news, news about epidemics & outbreaks, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
populist vaccine deniersGuardian
•Health
Health
How Covid left a legacy of distrust and conspiracies | Letters

47% Informative
Laura Spinney ’s piece is a sad reflection of how pandemic control preferences quickly aligned along traditional political lines.
Dr Aodhan Breathnach says we need to do something about the negative narrative that has developed on the pandemic.
The populist vaccine deniers who post on Facebook have had to go much further recently.
They claim microbes don’t exist and there are no such things as viruses and bacteria.
VR Score
38
Informative language
31
Neutral language
4
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
62
Offensive language
likely offensive
Hate speech
possibly hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links