Public display of human remains offensive
This is a news story, published by Guardian, that relates primarily to Bell Ribeiro-Addy news.
Bell Ribeiro-Addy news
For more Bell Ribeiro-Addy news, you can click here:
more Bell Ribeiro-Addy newsart and culture news
For more art and culture news, you can click here:
more art and culture newsGuardian news
For more news from Guardian, you can click here:
more news from GuardianAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best entertainment news, business news, world news, and much more. If you like art and culture news, you might also like this article about
human remains. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest African ancestral remains news, British Museum news, art and culture news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
African Ancestral Remains projectGuardian
•Entertainment
Entertainment
Ancestral remains should no longer be displayed in UK museums, say MPs

78% Informative
All-Party Parliamentary Group for Afrikan Reparations (APPG-AR) said it should become an offence to sell ancestral remains or publicly display them without consent.
Law should be changed to allow national museums to remove, or “deaccession”, remains in their permanent collections.
MP Bell Ribeiro-Addy said the report’s recommendations would help address the racial injustice wrought by colonial trade in human remains.
VR Score
75
Informative language
74
Neutral language
21
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
62
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
5
Source diversity
5
Affiliate links
no affiliate links